The tragic death of eight-year-old Victoria Climbié in 2000 from abuse and neglect by her guardians led to major changes in child protection policy in the UK, among them the launch of the controversial ContactPoint database in England this year. Victoria had been seen by doctors, nurses, police, and social workers who noted her injuries, but failed to coordinate and act to stop the abuse. In response, the database was set up in order to improve communication between services about the needs of children, and holds basic information about each child, including name, address, gender, date of birth, school and health provider. On May 18, ContactPoint entered the next phase of roll-out when it became available to workers in 17 authorities in northwest England, before it is fully rolled out to the rest of the country.
While the government’s efforts to ensure children’s protection rights are laudable, the approach is problematic. ContactPoint infringes on the right to privacy, and more importantly, may not be the best way to improve child welfare. The UK Joint Committee On Human Rights questioned in a 2004 report whether universal database coverage of children at the expense of privacy is justified in order to achieve such a “general aim” as ensuring the well-being of all children. Instead, the committee had suggested a more targeted registry aimed at protecting vulnerable children. Chris Mills also argued in the Guardian that since ContactPoint does not include children who are temporarily residing in England, children like Victoria Climbié ironically would not benefit from the database anyway.
Popular opinion since the database’s proposal has been that it will only create extra problems. The Joint Committee On Human Rights voiced concerns over the inclusion of contact details of service providers; although no medical or personal records can be included in the database, sensitive information may still be revealed, such as a referral for a teenager to family planning services. Even children themselves are worried. A 2006 report found that children fear the database will expose them to harm, and do not trust the government to keep the database secure. Many felt they would not use sexual or mental health services for fear of disclosure to their school or parents, and some even pledged to evade being entered into the database.
It will be interesting to see whether the unpopular database will actually be able to better coordinate children’s services, or if the critics are right.
See more links below the fold:


